Outcomes from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks measured uniquely for each project.
Intervention Reach
Definition: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are willing to participate in a given initiative, intervention, or program, and reasons why or why not.
(From the RE-AIM Model Dimension Items Checklist)
| Reach | |
| Exclusion Criteria (% excluded or characteristics) | |
| Percent individuals (clients, patients) who participate, based on valid denominator (not of volunteers who indicate interest) | |
| Characteristics of participants compared to non-participants or to target population | |
| Use of qualitative methods to understand reach and/or recruitment |
Intervention Adoption
Definition: (Setting levels) The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of settings and intervention agents (people who deliver the program) who are willing to initiate a program, and why. Note that adoption can have many (nested) levels- for example, staff under a supervisor under a clinic or school, under a system, within a community.
(From the RE-AIM Model Dimension Items Checklist)
| Adoption – Setting Level | |
| Setting Exclusions (% or reasons) | |
| Percent of settings approached that participate (valid denominator) | |
| Characteristics of settings participating (both comparison and intervention) compared to either: non-participants or some relevant resource data | |
| Adoption – Staff Level | |
| Staff Exclusions (% or reasons) | |
| Percent of staff invited that participate | |
| Characteristics of staff participants vs. non-participating staff or typical staff | |
| Use of qualitative methods to understand staff participation |
Implementation Strategies Adoption
Definition: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of settings and recipients who received the implementation strategy.
| Adoption – Setting Level | |
| Setting Exclusions (% or reasons) | |
| Percent of settings approached that participate (valid denominator) | |
| Characteristics of settings participating (both comparison and intervention) compared to either: non-participants or some relevant resource data | |
| Adoption – Staff Level | |
| Staff Exclusions (% or reasons) | |
| Percent of staff invited that participate | |
| Characteristics of staff participants vs. non-participating staff or typical staff | |
| Use of qualitative methods to understand staff participation |