Assessed at the end of a project with a six question survey to study participants to measure their perceived burden of participating in the study, appropriateness of the level of compensation offered, and overall satisfaction with the study experience.
Needs and experiences of direct/primary users (people who directly interact with the intervention and implementation strategy) and indirect/secondary users (people affected by the intervention and implementation strategy) are assessed differently based on project. Methods frequently used include: interviews, focus groups, observation, comparative testing (e.g., A/B testing), and co-design.
Participant collected demographic data based on project needs and U.S. National Institute of Mental Health requirements.
PROMIS Social Functioning • Top Problems Assessment • DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure • Revised Children’s Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25) • Patient Health Questionnaire – 9 (PHQ-9) • General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) • WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0)
Assessed using a UWAC-developed survey based on Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based practices (FRAME) and Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to capture adaptations made reactively (e.g., after intervention deployment).
Assessed using a UWAC-developed survey based on Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based practices (FRAME) and Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to capture adaptations made proactively (e.g., as part of the design process).
Measured by comparing the intended, original evidence-based intervention or implementation strategy protocol with the intervention or implementation strategy as delivered (fidelity of practice). This is measured uniquely for each project.
Outcomes from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks measured uniquely for each project.
Assessed through the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) survey and goodness-of-fit interview.
Assessed through the UWAC Engagement Measure, observation, self-report, and telemetry (for digital interventions and implementation strategies).