R03 – Discovering the Capacity of Primary Care Frontline Staff to Deliver a Low-Intensity, Technology-Enhanced Intervention to Treat Geriatric Depression

Principal Investigators
Brenna Renn, PhD, Acting Assistant Professor, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences
Oleg Zaslavsky, PhD, MHA, RN, Assistant Professor, Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics
Project Description
Older adults with depression typically present to primary care rather than specialty mental health treatment and are often un- or undertreated, as the demand for mental health services is greater than the supply of trained providers. Technology is one method to improve access to care by making evidence-based psychosocial interventions (EBPIs) readily accessible. A second method comes from global mental health research, demonstrating that task-sharing can equip non-specialists to provide effective mental health care. This study combines these two approaches, exploring how technology-enhanced EBPI could be used by frontline primary care staff (e.g., nurses, medical assistants) to expand workforce capacity to deliver acceptable, sustainable, and effective treatment for depression.
Setting | Primary care |
Population | Older adults with depression |
Intervention and/or Implementation Strategy Designed or Redesigned
Intervention | Task-sharing to deliver Mobile Motivational Physical Activity Targeted Intervention (MobMPATI), which is based on behavioral activation for depression and uses wearable accelerometer technology to trigger personalized activity goal monitoring. The intervention is delivered by frontline primary care staff (e.g., nurses, medical assistants). |
Implementation Strategy | Design an implementation strategy to support MobMPATI delivery, and conduct a pilot usability trial to test the implementation strategy. |
Impact
This approach addresses critical barriers to geriatric depression treatment in primary care, including the shortage of trained mental health providers and limited access to evidence-based interventions. By expanding workforce capacity through task-sharing and technology enhancement, the intervention has the potential to improve detection and treatment rates for depression among older adults who primarily receive care in primary care settings rather than specialty mental health services. The study addresses the significant gap where only about one in five older adults with depression receives effective treatment in primary care.
Project Publications
Patient Digital Health Technologies to Support Primary Care Across Clinical Contexts: Survey of Primary Care Providers, Behavioral Health Consultants, and Nurses
JMIR Formative Research 2022 · PubMed · Publisher
Authors
Oleg Zaslavsky, Frances Chu, Brenna N Renn
Abstract
Background: The acceptance of digital health technologies to support patient care for various clinical conditions among primary care providers and staff has not been explored.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the extent of potential differences between major groups of providers and staff in primary care, including behavioral health consultants (BHCs; eg, psychologists, social workers, and counselors), primary care providers (PCPs; eg, physicians and nurse practitioners), and nurses (registered nurses and licensed practical nurses) in the acceptance of various health technologies (ie, mobile apps, wearables, live video, phone, email, instant chats, text messages, social media, and patient portals) to support patient care across a variety of clinical situations.
Methods: We surveyed 151 providers (51 BHCs, 52 PCPs, and 48 nurses) embedded in primary care clinics across the United States who volunteered to respond to a web-based survey distributed in December 2020 by a large health care market research company. Respondents indicated the technologies they consider appropriate to support patients’ health care needs across the following clinical contexts: acute and chronic disease, medication management, health-promoting behaviors, sleep, substance use, and common and serious mental health conditions. We used descriptive statistics to summarize the distribution of demographic characteristics by provider type. We used contingency tables to compile summaries of the proportion of provider types endorsing each technology within and across clinical contexts. This study was exploratory in nature, with the intent to inform future research.
Results: Most of the respondents were from urban and suburban settings (125/151, 82.8%), with 12.6% (n=19) practicing in rural or frontier settings and 4.6% (n=7) practicing in rural-serving clinics. Respondents were dispersed across the United States, including the Northeast (31/151, 20.5%), Midwest (n=32, 21.2%), South (n=49, 32.5%), and West (n=39, 25.8%). The highest acceptance for technologies across clinical contexts was among BHCs (32/51, 63%) and PCPs (30/52, 58%) for live video and among nurses for mobile apps (30/48, 63%). A higher percentage of nurses accepted all other technologies relative to BHCs and PCPs. Similarly, relative to other groups, PCPs indicated lower levels of acceptance. Within clinical contexts, the highest acceptance rates were reported among 80% (41/51) of BHCs and 69% (36/52) of PCPs endorsing live video for common mental health conditions and 75% (36/48) of nurses endorsing mobile apps for health-promoting behaviors. The lowest acceptance across providers was for social media in the context of medication management (9.3% [14/151] endorsement across provider type).
Conclusions: The survey suggests potential differences in the way primary care clinicians and staff envision using technologies to support patient care. Future work must attend to reasons for differences in the acceptance of various technologies across providers and clinical contexts. Such an understanding will help inform appropriate implementation strategies to increase acceptability and gain greater adoption of appropriate technologies across conditions and patient populations.
Artificial Intelligence: An Interprofessional Perspective on Implications for Geriatric Mental Health Research and Care
Frontiers in Psychiatry 2021 · PubMed · Publisher
Authors
Brenna N Renn, Matthew Schurr, Oleg Zaslavsky, Abhishek Pratap
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare aims to learn patterns in large multimodal datasets within and across individuals. These patterns may either improve understanding of current clinical status or predict a future outcome. AI holds the potential to revolutionize geriatric mental health care and research by supporting diagnosis, treatment, and clinical decision-making. However, much of this momentum is driven by data and computer scientists and engineers and runs the risk of being disconnected from pragmatic issues in clinical practice. This interprofessional perspective bridges the experiences of clinical scientists and data science. We provide a brief overview of AI with the main focus on possible applications and challenges of using AI-based approaches for research and clinical care in geriatric mental health. We suggest future AI applications in geriatric mental health consider pragmatic considerations of clinical practice, methodological differences between data and clinical science, and address issues of ethics, privacy, and trust.
Telemental Health After COVID-19: Understanding Effectiveness and Implementation across Patient Populations while Building Provider Acceptance are the Next Steps
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 82(5); 2021 · PubMed · Publisher
Authors
Brenna N Renn, Frances Chu, Oleg Zaslavsky