Assessed using a UWAC-developed survey based on Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based practices (FRAME) and Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications to Evidence-based Implementation Strategies (FRAME-IS) to capture adaptations made proactively (e.g., as part of the design process).
Measured by comparing the intended, original evidence-based intervention or implementation strategy protocol with the intervention or implementation strategy as delivered (fidelity of practice). This is measured uniquely for each project.
Outcomes from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks measured uniquely for each project.
Assessed through the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) survey and goodness-of-fit interview.
Assessed through the UWAC Engagement Measure, observation, self-report, and telemetry (for digital interventions and implementation strategies).
Assessed through usability evaluation, which includes methods such as heuristic evaluations, usability testing, cognitive walkthroughs, and standardized surveys (e.g., System/Intervention/Implementation Strategy Usability Scale).